Skip to main content

Empirical formula

This is simply used to show a formula ratio between different elements. If you know the mass of each element in a compound you can calculate its empirical formula. Remember from the amount of substance post that we learnt about an important equation:

n = m / M    
                   n = Amount of substance
                   m = Mass
                   M = Molar mass

Let works with an example to show the empirical formula:

Analysis shows that 0.6075g of magnesium combines with 3.995g of bromine to form a compound.

Ar is the mass number of a singular atom, in this case it would be:

Mg = 24.3
Br = 79.9

                                                                       Mg   :   Br
 
This is where the ratio begins, starting with the mass divided by the molar mass. So I will do this separately first:
 
Mg = 0.6075 / 24.3
 
Resulting in 0.025
 
Br = 3.995 / 79.9
 
Resulting in 0.050

Ratio values do not have units so you don't need to stress about units here!
 
The weight of the element is given in the question and the relative atomic mass is found in any standardized periodic table of elements. From this we have simply divided the weight of the given element by the relative atomic mass! Using this we can now expand further with our next step of the ratio:
 
Mg    :    Br
0.6075/24.3   :    3.995/79.9
0.025    :   0.050
 
The last stage of this is to divide the smallest output number (0.025) into each of their ratio values. This is because ratios should always be whole numbers and not left as a decimal.
 
0.025 / 0.025 = 1
0.050 / 0.025 = 2
 
Making the ratio:

                                                                         Mg    :    Br
                                                       0.6075/24.3    :    3.995/79.9       weight / relative atomic massࣸ ⮯
                                                                     0.025    :    0.050      divide by 0.025 (smallest number)⮯      
1    :    2
 
 
This simply makes the compound MgBr₂ due to the output from the ratio. This is because for every one magnesium there is two bromine and this is simply plugged into the symbol form of this compound.
 
This isn't quite over yet as this kind of formula can be shown in a different way in question formats. Lets run through this one as well step by step:
 
Analysis of a compound showed that the following percentage composition for mass:
 
Na: 74.9%
O: 25.81%
 
Now once again we find the relative atomic mass of these individual elements:
 
Na - 23
O - 16
 
So to make this simple always assume you are using 100g of said compound as considering percentages in 100g is easiest as 1g is equal to 1% of the substance. As such the distribution would be:
 
Na - 74.9g
O - 25.81g
 
Then it's just a repeat of before:
 
Na = 74.19 / 23 = 3.226
O = 25.81 / 16 = 1.613
 
 
Na    :    O
                                                         74.19/23    :    25.81/16     weight / relative atomic massࣸ ⮯
                                                                   3.226    :    1.613     divide by 0.025 (smallest number)⮯   
 2    :    1
 
 
Making the compound Na₂O.
 
Simples, right?
 
Did you find this helpful? Feel free to drop a comment and let me know what you liked and if I have missed something!





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Electrons and orbitals

So everything you were taught at GCSE by your teachers, yeah that was all a lie, completely forget that they lied to you! Electron shells aren't flat they are 3D and that issue with going past 20 electrons? Fret no more because we can now get past this, admittedly with a lot of work but what doesn't kill you makes you stronger! So these electron orbitals are filled with sub levels, remember the 2.8.8.2 formula? Well it turns out they were actually sub levels in an atom, here take a look: As you can see the shells are known as 'n' and the number of that orbital increases the further away it gets. Now not to confuse you but technically they are all on top of each other and the distance between each of these is miniscule! When drawing them though I recommended giving them space otherwise you are not going to be working with a lot! So lets take a deep look at this: Orbitals are known as S, P, D, F and so on but you don't really need to know any further for now. No...
Post a Comment
Read more

Further gas equations

Previously in gas equations we learnt that - n=V/24000. There is one other side to this equation for when those hateful questions come up! As always we will run through this simply and easily but first we need to start off with the symbols that make up this equation: n =  as always is mol T = Temperature measured in K P = Pressure measured in KPa V = Gas volume measured in dm cubed R = The gas constant Now I understand that this may seem like a lot of info but let break this down: STP means the standard temperature and pressure which results in-      - Standard temperature being 298K     - Standard pressure being 100KPa As usual we don't question and in the legendry words of the Beatles 'Let it be' ... I should probably stop with the jokes! The other thing that is quite important that you know is the gas constant which is 8.314mol -1 K -1 and once again keep the previous sentence in mind! The actual equation for this is: PV = R x nT or ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Moles and gas volumes

This is similar to amount of substance, however we are working with gases and gas volumes alone. This works effectively when the substance is held at RTP. When the volume is in cm cubed the equation is: n=V/24000       n=Moles                          V=volume                          As for the 24,000 just don't question it! If that's what they want, that's what they'll get! As usual we will go through some examples step by step. However, one thing you do need to know is RTP meaning room temperature and pressure. What amount, in mol, of gas molecules is in 72 cm cubed of any gas at RTP? This is simply plugged in: n=72/24,000= 0.0030 moles Now lets try something a little more brain tingling: What is...
Post a Comment
Read more